Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J R Soc Med. 2020 Feb;113(2):64-78. doi: 10.1177/0141076819899308. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

Will HPV vaccination prevent cervical cancer?

Author information

1
Centre for Global Public Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University, London E1 2AB, UK.
2
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE2 4AX, UK.

Abstract

We conducted a critical appraisal of published Phase 2 and 3 efficacy trials in relation to the prevention of cervical cancer in women. Our analysis shows the trials themselves generated significant uncertainties undermining claims of efficacy in these data. There were 12 randomised control trials (RCTs) of Cervarix and Gardasil. The trial populations did not reflect vaccination target groups due to differences in age and restrictive trial inclusion criteria. The use of composite and distant surrogate outcomes makes it impossible to determine effects on clinically significant outcomes. It is still uncertain whether human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination prevents cervical cancer as trials were not designed to detect this outcome, which takes decades to develop. Although there is evidence that vaccination prevents cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) this is not a clinically important outcome (no treatment is given). Trials used composite surrogate outcomes which included CIN1. High efficacy against CIN1+ (CIN1, 2, 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)) does not necessarily mean high efficacy against CIN3+ (CIN3 and AIS), which occurs much less frequently. There are too few data to clearly conclude that HPV vaccine prevents CIN3+. CIN in general is likely to have been overdiagnosed in the trials because cervical cytology was conducted at intervals of 6-12 months rather than at the normal screening interval of 36 months. This means that the trials may have overestimated the efficacy of the vaccine as some of the lesions would have regressed spontaneously. Many trials diagnosed persistent infection on the basis of frequent testing at short intervals, i.e. less than six months. There is uncertainty as to whether detected infections would clear or persist and lead to cervical changes.

KEYWORDS:

Vaccination programmes; cervical cancer

PMID:
31962050
DOI:
10.1177/0141076819899308

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center