Clamping trials prior to thoracostomy tube removal and the need for subsequent invasive pleural drainage

Am J Surg. 2020 Aug;220(2):476-481. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

Abstract

Background: There is little evidence supporting or refuting clamping trials, a period of clamping thoracostomy tubes prior to removal. We sought to evaluate whether clamping trials reduce the need for subsequent pleural drainage procedures.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of trauma patients who underwent tube thoracostomy during 2009-2015. We compared patients who underwent clamping trials to those who did not, adjusting for confounders. The primary outcome was subsequent ipsilateral pleural drainage within 30 days.

Results: We evaluated 214 clamping trial and 285 control patients. Only two of 214 patients failed their clamping trial and none developed a tension pneumothorax [0.0% (95% CI 0.0-1.7%)]. Clamping trials were associated with fewer pleural drainage procedures [13 (6%) vs. 33 (12%); adjusted OR 0.41 (95% CI 0.20-0.84)].

Conclusions: A clamping trial prior to thoracostomy tube removal seems to be safe and was associated with less likelihood of a subsequent pleural drainage procedure.

Keywords: Chest tube; Clamping trial; Pneumothorax; Thoracostomy tube.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cohort Studies
  • Constriction
  • Device Removal / methods*
  • Drainage / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pleural Effusion / therapy*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Thoracostomy / instrumentation*