Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;13(1):e007544. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007544. Epub 2020 Jan 15.

Epicardial Connections Involving Pulmonary Veins: The Prevalence, Predictors, and Implications for Ablation Outcome.

Author information

1
Electrophysiology and Arrhythmia Unit, Centro integral de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (HM CIEC), Hospital Universitario HM Monteprincipe, HM Hospitales, University CEU-San Pablo, Madrid, Spain (M.T.B.-L., J.G.-M., A.B., E.C., M.A., M.O., J.A.).
2
Anatomy and Cell Biology Department, School of Medicine, University of Badajoz, Spain (D.S.-Q., J.N.-M.).
3
Cardiac Electrophysisology Program, Hospital of the Univeristy of Pennsylvania, Perlman School of Medicine, Philadelphia (F.G.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The presence of epicardial connections (ECs) between pulmonary veins (PVs) and other anatomic structures may hinder PV isolation. In this study, we analyzed their prevalence, location, associated factors, and clinical implications.

METHODS:

Five hundred thirty-four consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency ablation were included. We considered that an EC was present if: (1) the first pass around the PV antrum did not produce PV isolation and (2) subsequent atrial activation during PV pacing showed that the earliest site was located away from the ablation line and later activation sites were observed near the ablation line. Clinical and electrophysiological variables were collected from all patients. Patients were followed during 12.9±9.4 months, and any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia after the 3-month blanking period was classified as a recurrence.

RESULTS:

Out of the 534 patients included, 72 (13.5%) were found to have 81 ECs. There was a significant association between the presence of ECs and structural heart disease (15.3% in patients without ECs versus 36.5% in patient with ECs; P<0.001) and patent foramen ovale (4.6% versus 13.5%; P=0.002). The presence of a left common trunk was significantly associated with the absence of ECs (29.6% in patients without ECs versus 16.2% in patients with ECs; P=0.014). Patients with ECs had lower acute success in PV isolation compared with patients without ECs (99.1% versus 86.1%; P<0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, type of atrial fibrillation, left atrium area, hypertension, structural heart disease, presence of left common trunk, patent foramen ovale, and time for atrial fibrillation diagnosis to the ablation, we found a significantly higher risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences in patients with ECs compared with patients without ECs (hazard ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1-2.9]; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS:

ECs between PVs and other adjacent structures are frequent in patient with atrial fibrillation (prevalence: 13.5%). Structural heart disease and a patent foramen ovale are strongly associated with the presence of ECs. ECs reduce the acute and chronic success of PV isolation.

KEYWORDS:

ablation; atrial fibrillation; ligament of Marshall; prevalence; pulmonary vein

PMID:
31940223
DOI:
10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007544

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center