Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Invest Radiol. 2019 Dec 30. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000618. [Epub ahead of print]

Quantification of Aortic Stiffness by Ultrasound Time-Harmonic Elastography: The Effect of Intravascular Pressure on Elasticity Measures in a Porcine Model.

Author information

1
From the Department of Radiology.
2
Institute for Medical Informatics, Campus Benjamin Franklin.
3
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to investigate blood pressure dependency of ultrasound time-harmonic elastography (THE) for quantification of aortic stiffness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Thoracoabdominal aortas were surgically removed from 9 healthy domestic pigs and prepared for elastographic experiments. All vessels were connected to a saline-filled water column with adjustable height and pressurized over a range of 0 to 110 mm Hg in 10 mm Hg increments to simulate different levels of mean arterial pressure. In addition, 3 of the 9 aortas were soaked in 4% buffered formaldehyde for 60 minutes to simulate pathologic aortic stiffening. Ultrasound THE was performed in each vessel at each pressure level. For each pressure level, shear-wave speed (SWS) as a measure of aortic wall stiffness and luminal diameter were recorded. The pressure range between 30 and 110 mm Hg was used for statistical evaluation as it reflects a physiological mean arterial pressure range. Linear regression analysis and multivariate analysis with a general linear model were performed to evaluate the influence of increasing intravascular pressure and vessel diameter on measured SWS.

RESULTS:

Median SWS in formalin-soaked aortas was significantly higher with 3.22 m/s (interquartile range [IQR], 0.01 m/s) versus 2.14 m/s (IQR, 0.09) at 30 mm Hg and 3.38 m/s (IQR, 0.01 m/s) versus 2.28 m/s (IQR, 0.07 m/s) at 110 mm Hg (each P = 0.01). Using linear regression analysis, an increase of aortic wall SWS of 0.017 m/s per 10 mm Hg intraluminal pressure was found in untreated aortas, whereas SWS increased by 0.020 m/s per 10 mm Hg in formalin-soaked aortas (both P = 0.001). The percentage of SWS caused by intraluminal pressure was 1.89% in formalin-soaked aortas and 2.50% in untreated aortas at 30 mm Hg and 6.61% for formalin-soaked aortas and 8.60% for untreated aortas at 110 mm Hg. Multivariate analysis showed no significant interaction of luminal diameter and measured SWS (P = 0.893).

CONCLUSIONS:

In our model, aortic stiffness measurements by ultrasound time-harmonic elastography are influenced to a small extent by mean arterial pressure in a range of 1.89% to 8.60%. These findings emphasize the potential of ultrasound THE for measuring the intrinsic stiffness of the aortic wall in clinical routine.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center