Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Dec 23;19(Suppl 7):276. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0979-5.

Using an artificial neural network to map cancer common data elements to the biomedical research integrated domain group model in a semi-automated manner.

Author information

1
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
2
School of Computing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
3
College of Allied Health Professions, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36608, USA.
4
College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
5
School of Computing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA. huang@southalabama.edu.
6
Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Science), Jinan, China. huang@southalabama.edu.
7
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. jiang.guoqian@mayo.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The medical community uses a variety of data standards for both clinical and research reporting needs. ISO 11179 Common Data Elements (CDEs) represent one such standard that provides robust data point definitions. Another standard is the Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG) model, which is a domain analysis model that provides a contextual framework for biomedical and clinical research data. Mapping the CDEs to the BRIDG model is important; in particular, it can facilitate mapping the CDEs to other standards. Unfortunately, manual mapping, which is the current method for creating the CDE mappings, is error-prone and time-consuming; this creates a significant barrier for researchers who utilize CDEs.

METHODS:

In this work, we developed a semi-automated algorithm to map CDEs to likely BRIDG classes. First, we extended and improved our previously developed artificial neural network (ANN) alignment algorithm. We then used a collection of 1284 CDEs with robust mappings to BRIDG classes as the gold standard to train and obtain the appropriate weights of six attributes in CDEs. Afterward, we calculated the similarity between a CDE and each BRIDG class. Finally, the algorithm produces a list of candidate BRIDG classes to which the CDE of interest may belong.

RESULTS:

For CDEs semantically similar to those used in training, a match rate of over 90% was achieved. For those partially similar, a match rate of 80% was obtained and for those with drastically different semantics, a match rate of up to 70% was achieved.

DISCUSSION:

Our semi-automated mapping process reduces the burden of domain experts. The weights are all significant in six attributes. Experimental results indicate that the availability of training data is more important than the semantic similarity of the testing data to the training data. We address the overfitting problem by selecting CDEs randomly and adjusting the ratio of training and verification samples.

CONCLUSIONS:

Experimental results on real-world use cases have proven the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed methodology in mapping CDEs with BRIDG classes, both those CDEs seen before as well as new, unseen CDEs. In addition, it reduces the mapping burden and improves the mapping quality.

KEYWORDS:

Artificial neural network; Biomedical research integrated domain group (BRIDG) model; Common data element; Schema mapping

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center