Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Crit Care. 2019 Dec 10;56:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.008. [Epub ahead of print]

Fluctuations of consciousness after stroke: Associations with the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and potential undetected delirium.

Author information

1
Department of Neurology, Brown University, Alpert Medical School, United States of America; Department of Neurosurgery, Brown University, Alpert Medical School, United States of America. Electronic address: michael_reznik@brown.edu.
2
Department of Neurology, Brown University, Alpert Medical School, United States of America.
3
Department of Neurology, Brown University, Alpert Medical School, United States of America; Department of Neurosurgery, Brown University, Alpert Medical School, United States of America.
4
Department of Neurology, New York Langone Health, United States of America.
5
Department of Medicine, Brown University, Alpert Medical School, United States of America.
6
Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, United States of America.
7
Department of Neurology, Brown University, Alpert Medical School, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Alpert Medical School, United States of America.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To examine associations between fluctuating consciousness and Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) assessments in stroke patients compared to non-neurological patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We linked all recorded CAM-ICU assessments with corresponding Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) measurements in patients with stroke or sepsis from a single-center ICU database. Fluctuating consciousness was defined by RASS variability using standard deviations (SD) over 24-h periods; regression analyses were performed to determine associations with RASS variability and CAM-ICU rating.

RESULTS:

We identified 16,509 paired daily summaries of CAM-ICU and RASS measurements in 546 stroke patients and 1586 sepsis patients. Stroke patients had higher odds of positive (OR 4.2, 95% CI 3.3-5.5) and "unable to assess" (UTA; OR 5.2, 95% CI 4.0-6.8) CAM-ICU ratings compared to sepsis patients, and CAM-ICU-positive and UTA assessment-days had higher RASS variability than CAM-ICU-negative assessment-days, especially in stroke patients. Based on model-implied associations of RASS variability (OR 2.0 per semi-IQR-difference in RASS-SD, 95% CI 1.7-2.2) and stroke diagnosis (OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.0-3.7) with CAM-ICU-positive assessments, over one-third of probable delirium cases among stroke patients were potentially missed by the CAM-ICU.

CONCLUSIONS:

Post-stroke delirium may frequently go undetected by the CAM-ICU, even in the setting of fluctuating consciousness.

KEYWORDS:

Consciousness; Delirium; Sepsis; Stroke

PMID:
31855707
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.008

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center