Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;22(10):1372-1377. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_101_19.

Evaluating surgical outcomes of conventional versus endoscopic septoplasty using subjective and objective methods.

Author information

1
Department of ENT, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.

Abstract

Objectives:

The aim of the study is to compare the pre- and post-operative symptomatology, endoscopic findings, and nasal patency and to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of conventional compared to endoscopic septoplasty (ES).

Materials and Methods:

This prospective study was conducted at Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India, on 50 patients aged between 18 and 60 years having symptomatic deviated nasal septum and refractory to medical treatment. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A, which included 25 patients in whom conventional septoplasty (CS) was performed, and Group B, which included 25 patients in whom ES was conducted. The postoperative assessment was carried out at once weekly for 1 month and twice weekly for another 2 months.

Results:

Nasal obstruction was relieved in 79.1% cases belonging to Group A and 91.3% cases to Group B. Headache was relieved in 62.5% cases belonging to Group A and 93.3% cases to Group B. Postnasal drip was relieved in 73.3% cases in Group A and 94.1% cases in Group B. The results were found to be statistically significant. An improvement in visual analog scale score was observed in both groups, but statistically significant difference was seen at 2nd and 4th week. Postoperative nasal patency improvement was observed in both groups by the Gertner plate, and the results were found to be statistically significant. Postoperative hemorrhage was observed in 24% cases in Group A and 12% cases in Group B. Septal perforation, septal hematoma, and mucosal tear were observed in 4%, 4%, and 8% of cases, respectively, in Group A. No such complication was reported in Group B.

Conclusion:

ES is more effective in terms of relief of symptoms and improvement of nasal patency. It is best for isolated spur, posterior deviation, and revision surgery, but anterior caudal dislocation is best handled with CS. Both these techniques should be taken as an adjuvant to each other.

KEYWORDS:

Conventional septoplasty; deviated nasal septum; endoscopic septoplasty; nasal obstruction; postnasal drip; spur; visual analog scale

PMID:
31607726
DOI:
10.4103/njcp.njcp_101_19
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center