Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 Sep 30:appineuropsych18110290. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.18110290. [Epub ahead of print]

Internal Versus External Frame of Reference in Functional Movement Disorders.

Author information

1
The Department of Neurology, Gardner Family Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. (Vizcarra, Hacker, Lopez-Castellanos, Ryes, Laub, Marsili, Espay); the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Tex. (Dwivedi); and the Department of Neurology, Division of Movement Disorders, University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky. (LaFaver).

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with functional movement disorders (FMDs) differ in their internal versus external locus of control (LOC) and whether LOC in these patients affected disease severity, quality of life, and functional impairment compared with control subjects with degenerative (Parkinson's disease) and nondegenerative (focal dystonia) neurological conditions.

METHODS:

A total of 156 patients with FMD (N=45), Parkinson's disease (N=64), and focal dystonia (N=47) were recruited between June 2015 and August 2017. The authors administered the general Levenson Multidimensional LOC (LOC-G) and health-specific Multidimensional Health LOC (LOC-H) scales. An internal LOC was represented similarly in both scales: the external LOC included "chance" and "powerful others" in the LOC-G measure and chance, "other people," and "doctors" in the LOC-H measure. Quality of life, functional impairment, and FMD severity were assessed. One-way analysis of variance and adjusted logistic regressions were used, as well as ordinary least-squares between and within groups, respectively.

RESULTS:

Patients with FMD had lower external chance LOC-G scores compared with patients in the Parkinson's disease group (odds ratio=0.90, p=0.03) and higher internal (odds ratio=1.22, p=0.01) and lower external (odds ratio=0.77, p=0.02) doctors LOC-H scores compared with patients in the focal dystonia group. External powerful others LOC-G score was associated with functional impairment (regression coefficient=-0.04, p=0.02). There were no effects of LOC on quality of life or disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with FMD exhibited high "within our control" internal general and health-specific frame of reference. LOC had no influence on quality of life or disease severity in this patient population.

KEYWORDS:

Frame of Reference; Functional Movement Disorders; Locus of Control; Psychogenic Movement Disorders

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center