Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 6;19(1):1234. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7573-8.

Cost-effectiveness of a statewide public health intervention to reduce cardiovascular disease risk.

Author information

1
School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, USA.
2
Center for Health Services Research, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, 89 Beaumont Ave, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA. Adam.Atherly@med.uvm.edu.
3
School of Pharmacy University of Colorado, Aurora, USA.
4
Colorado Prevention Center, Denver, USA.
5
Denver Health Medical Center Cardiology Division, Denver, USA.
6
School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The cost-effectiveness of community health worker (CHW)-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk-reduction interventions is not well established. Colorado Heart Healthy Solutions is a CHW-based intervention designed to reduce modifiable CVD risk factors. This program has previously demonstrated success, but the cost-effectiveness is unknown. CHW-based interventions are potentially attractive complements to healthcare delivery because laypersons implement the intervention at a lower cost relative to medical care and may be attractive in rural settings with limited clinical resources.

METHODS:

CHWs performed screenings and provided ongoing participant support within predominantly rural communities. A point-of-service software tool was used to generate 10-year Framingham CVD risk scores and assist CHWs to make medical referrals and provide ongoing individualized support for lifestyle changes. A sample of program participants returned for reassessment of risk factors. We calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and program costs using a Markov model. Transition probabilities were calculated using Framingham risk equations or derived from the literature using the observed mean reduction in 10-year CVD risk score over of 37- months follow-up. Program cost-effectiveness was calculated for both at-risk (abnormal baseline CVD risk factors) and overall program populations.

RESULTS:

The base-case scenario evaluating a 52-year-old male participant revealed an incremental cost savings of $3576 and a gain of 0.16 QALYs associated with the intervention. Cost savings were greater in at-risk populations. The economic dominance of the model was robust in multiple sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS:

A community-based CVD intervention demonstrated to reduce CVD risk is cost-effective. This suggests that population-based public health programs may have the potential to complement primary care preventative services to improve health and reduce the burden of traditional medical care.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center