Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2019 Nov;32(6):354-364. doi: 10.1177/0891988719862637.

Automated Brain MRI Volumetry Differentiates Early Stages of Alzheimer's Disease From Normal Aging.

Zhao W1,2, Luo Y3, Zhao L3, Mok V4, Su L5,6, Yin C2, Sun Y1, Lu J7, Shi L3,8, Han Y1,9,10,11.

Author information

1
1 Department of Neurology, XuanWu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
2
2 Department of Neurology, Mudanjiang Medical University Affiliated HongQi Hospital, Mudanjiang, China.
3
3 BrainNow Research Institute, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
4
4 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
5
5 Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
6
6 China-UK Centre for Cognition and Aging Research, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
7
7 Department of Radiology, XuanWu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
8
8 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
9
9 Center of Alzheimer's Disease, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.
10
10 Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Beijing, China.
11
11 National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Beijing, China.

Abstract

As an enrichment strategy supplemented by the diagnostic framework of subjective cognitive decline (SCD), SCD plus identifies features that may increase the likelihood of including future-Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. This study aimed to identify the shared and distinct atrophy patterns between patients specified by SCD plus and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI, a prodromal stage of AD) and to investigate the extent that automated brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetry can differentiate patients with SCD from normal control (NC) participants and patients with aMCI. We acquired structural MRI brain scans from 44 patients with aMCI, 40 patients with SCD (who met the major criteria of SCD plus), and 48 NC participants. Automatic brain segmentation was performed to quantify the volumetric measures of cognitive-relevant areas. These volumetric measures were compared across the 3 groups with analysis of variance. In addition, we performed support vector machine analyses using volumetric measures of single regions or multiple regions to further evaluate the sensitivity of automated brain volumetry in differentiating a specific group from another. The atrophy patterns in patients with aMCI and SCD were similar. Using the regional volumetric measures, we achieved high performance in differentiating aMCI and SCD from NCs (average classification accuracy [ACC] > 90%). However, the performance was not ideal when differentiating aMCI from SCD (ACC < 63%). In conclusion, patients with SCD specified by SCD plus presented similar atrophy patterns as patients with aMCI, which was distinguishable from NC participants. Future studies should aim to associate the atrophy patterns of SCD with possible conversion to aMCI or AD in a longitudinal design.

KEYWORDS:

Alzheimer disease; amnestic mild cognitive impairment; brain volumetry; magnetic resonance imaging; subjective cognitive decline

PMID:
31480984
DOI:
10.1177/0891988719862637

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center