Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Aug 29. doi: 10.1038/s41391-019-0170-1. [Epub ahead of print]

Regular vs. selective use of closed suction drains following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a regional quality improvement collaborative.

Author information

1
Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
2
Spectrum Health Hospital System, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
3
Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
4
Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. brian.lane@spectrumhealth.org.
5
Spectrum Health Hospital System, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. brian.lane@spectrumhealth.org.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Closed suction drain (CSD) placement is common in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Our goal is to quantify outcomes of RARP for patients undergoing RARP by surgeons who regularly or selectively use CSDs.

METHODS:

Patients undergoing RARP (4/2014-7/2017) were prospectively entered into the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) registry. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS) >2 days, >16-day catheterization, 30-day readmission, and clinically significant urine leak or ileus. Retrospective analysis of each adverse event was performed comparing groups using chi-square tests.

RESULTS:

In all, 6746 RARPs were performed by 115 MUSIC surgeons. CSDs were used in 4451 RARP (66.0%), with wide variation in surgeon CSD use (median: 94.7%, range: 0-100%, IQR: 45-100%). The cohorts of patients treated by surgeons with regular vs. selective CSD usage were similar. CSD use pattern was not associated with rates of prolonged catheterization (4.6% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.17) or readmission (4.5% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.35) and multivariable analysis confirmed these findings (each p > 0.10). Regular CSD use was associated with LOS >2 days (8.4% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.001) and multivariable analyses indicated an odds ratio (OR) of 1.42 (95% CI: 1.12-1.79; p = 0.017) and increased likelihood of clinically significant ileus (OR: 1.64; CI: 1.14-2.35; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although there are specific situations in which CSDs are beneficial, e.g. anastomotic leak or observed lymphatic drainage, regular CSD use during RARP was associated with a greater likelihood of LOS >2 days and clinically significant ileus. Our data suggest that CSD should be placed selectively rather than routinely after RARP.

PMID:
31467391
DOI:
10.1038/s41391-019-0170-1

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group
Loading ...
Support Center