Introduction: Paclitaxel micellar is a novel formulation of paclitaxel in which retinoic acid derivates solubilize paclitaxel. The aim of the present study was to compare the unbound and total plasma pharmacokinetics of the new formulation with those of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel and to further assess its safety.
Methods: In this open, randomized, cross-over study, 28 female patients with breast cancer were given paclitaxel micellar and nab-paclitaxel as a 1-h intravenous infusion at a dose of 260 mg/m2. Plasma samples were collected during 10 h, which were projected to cover at least 80% of the area to infinite time, AUCinf. Unbound paclitaxel was measured in ultrafiltrate of plasma. Total paclitaxel in plasma was measured after protein precipitation with acetonitrile. Both assays used ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) followed by MS/MS for drug quantification. The unbound fraction, fu, was calculated as the ratio between the unbound and the total concentration.
Results: No difference in fu of paclitaxel between the two formulations was observed. Statistical comparison of AUC0-10h and Cmax of unbound paclitaxel demonstrated that the two formulations met the criteria for bioequivalence. Regarding total paclitaxel levels, Cmax but not AUC0-10h met the criteria. This study supports a safe administration of paclitaxel micellar.
Conclusion: The two formulations, paclitaxel micellar and nab-paclitaxel, behaved similarly following infusion. Probably, both formulations dissociate immediately in the blood, whereupon released paclitaxel rapidly distributes into tissue. Judged from the bioequivalence demonstrated for unbound paclitaxel, the two formulations are considered clinically equivalent.
Trial registration: EudraCT no.: 2010-019838-27.
Funding: Oasmia Pharmaceutical AB.
Keywords: Apealea; Bioequivalence; Cancer; Cross-over; Nab-paclitaxel; Paclitaxel micellar; Pharmacokinetics.