Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05128-x. [Epub ahead of print]

Reasons Patients Choose the Emergency Department over Primary Care: a Qualitative Metasynthesis.

Author information

1
Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA. jody.vogel@cuanschutz.edu.
2
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. jody.vogel@cuanschutz.edu.
3
Center for Health Systems Research, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA. jody.vogel@cuanschutz.edu.
4
Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
5
College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
6
School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
7
Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
8
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
9
Center for Health Systems Research, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
10
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
11
Department of Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

To enhance the acute care delivery system, a comprehensive understanding of the patient's perspectives for seeking care in the emergency department (ED) versus primary care (PC) is necessary.

METHODS:

We conducted a qualitative metasynthesis on reasons patients seek care in the ED instead of PC. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, Psych Info, and Web of Science was completed to identify qualitative studies relevant to the research question. Articles were critically appraised using the McMaster University Critical Review Form for Qualitative Studies. We excluded pediatric articles and nonqualitative and mixed-methods studies. The metasynthesis was completed with an interpretive approach using reciprocal translation analyses.

RESULTS:

Nine articles met criteria for inclusion. Eleven themes under four domains were identified. The first domain was acuity of condition that led to the ED visit. In this domain, themes included pain: "it's urgent because it hurts," and concern for severe illness. The second domain was barriers associated with PC, which included difficulty accessing PC when ill: "my doctor said he was booked up and he instructed me to go to the ED." The third domain was related to multiple advantages associated with ED care: "my doctor cannot do X-rays and laboratory tests, while the ED has all the technical support." In this domain, patients also identified 24/7 accessibility of the ED and no need for an immediate copay at the ED as advantageous. The fourth domain included fulfillment of medical needs. Themes in this domain included the alleviation of pain and the perceived expertise of the ED healthcare providers.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this qualitative metasynthesis, reasons patients visit the ED over primary care included (1) urgency of the medical condition, (2) barriers to accessing primary care, (3) advantages of the ED, and (4) fulfillment of medical needs and quality of care in the ED.

KEYWORDS:

access to care; healthcare delivery; metasynthesis; patient preferences; patient-centered care; primary care; qualitative research

PMID:
31428988
DOI:
10.1007/s11606-019-05128-x

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center