Diagnostic accuracy of an algorithm for detecting atrial fibrillation in a wrist-type pulse wave monitor

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Sep;21(9):1393-1398. doi: 10.1111/jch.13648. Epub 2019 Aug 17.

Abstract

We evaluated the diagnostic value of atrial fibrillation (AF) measured by a wrist-type pulse wave monitor in this case-control study. Six serial pulse wave values (three in the left and three in the right wrist) were measured using a wrist-type monitor in 29 AF patients and 30 subjects with sinus rhythm. We defined "monitor AF in irregular pulse peak (IPP) 15/20/25" as follows: (a) IPP: |interval of pulse peak - the average of the interval of the pulse peak| ≥ the average of the interval of the pulse peak × 15/20/25%; (b) irregular heartbeat (IHB): beats of IPP ≥ total pulse × 20%; and (c) monitor AF: ≥4 IHBs of the six pulse wave measurements. In IPP 15, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 and 1.00, respectively. Pulse wave analysis by a wrist-type monitor was shown to have high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of AF.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; hypertension; pulse wave.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Algorithms
  • Atrial Fibrillation / diagnosis
  • Atrial Fibrillation / physiopathology*
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Electrocardiography / methods
  • Heart Rate / physiology
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / instrumentation*
  • Photoplethysmography / instrumentation
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Pulse Wave Analysis / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Wrist / blood supply*