Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019 Aug 12;19(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2624-3.

Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist.

Wang X1,2,3,4, Chen Y5,6,7,8, Liu Y1,2,3,4, Yao L9, Estill J10,11, Bian Z9, Wu T12, Shang H13, Lee MS14, Wei D15, Tian J1,2,3,4, Ma B1,2,3,4, Wang Y16, Tian G13, Yang K17,18,19,20.

Author information

1
Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
2
Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
3
Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
4
WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China.
5
Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. chenyaolong21@163.com.
6
Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. chenyaolong21@163.com.
7
Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China. chenyaolong21@163.com.
8
WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China. chenyaolong21@163.com.
9
Clinical Division, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
10
Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
11
Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Genewa, Geneva, Switzerland.
12
Chinese Cochrane Centre, Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
13
Dongzhimen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
14
Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea.
15
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
16
Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
17
Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. kehuyangebm2006@126.com.
18
Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. kehuyangebm2006@126.com.
19
Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China. kehuyangebm2006@126.com.
20
WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China. kehuyangebm2006@126.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Acupuncture is widely used worldwide, and systematic reviews on acupuncture are increasingly being published. Although acupuncture systematic reviews share several essential elements with other systematic reviews, some essential information for the application of acupuncture is not covered by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Considering this, we aimed to develop an extension of the PRISMA statement for acupuncture systematic reviews.

METHODS:

We used the PRISMA statement as a starting point, and conducted this study referring to the development strategy recommended by the EQUATOR network. The initial items were collected through a wide survey among evidence users and a review of relevant studies. We conducted a three-round Delphi survey and one-day face-to-face meeting to select items and formulate the checklist. After the consensus meeting, we drafted the manuscript (including the checklist) and sent it to our advisory experts for comments, following which the checklist was refined and circulated to a group of acupuncture systematic review authors for pilot test. We also selected a sample of acupuncture systematic reviews published in 2017 to test the checklist.

RESULTS:

A checklist of five new sub-items (including sub items) and six modified items was formulated, involving content related to title, rationale, eligibility criteria, literature search, data extraction, and study characteristics. We clarified the rationales of the items and provided examples for each item for additional guidance.

CONCLUSION:

The PRISMA for Acupuncture checklist is developed for improving the reporting of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

We have registered the study on the EQUATOR network ( http://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/#91 ).

KEYWORDS:

Acupuncture intervention; PRISMA; Systematic review

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center