Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1572-1581. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003959.

One-Year Outcomes Following Tracheostomy for Acute Respiratory Failure.

Author information

1
1Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO. 2Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. 3The Pulmonary Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA. 4Evans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA. 5Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO. 6Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Denver Health Hospital Association, Denver, CO.
2
The Pulmonary Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
3
Evans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
4
Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO.
5
Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
6
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Denver Health Hospital Association, Denver, CO.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Tracheostomy utilization has dramatically increased recently. Large gaps exist between expected and actual outcomes resulting in significant decisional conflict and regret. We determined 1-year patient outcomes and healthcare utilization following tracheostomy to aid in decision-making and resource allocation.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:

All California hospital discharges from 2012 to 2013 with follow-up through 2014.

PATIENTS:

Nonsurgical patients who received a tracheostomy for acute respiratory failure.

INTERVENTIONS:

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

Our primary outcome was 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. We also determined hospitals readmissions rates and healthcare utilization in the first year following tracheostomy. We identified 8,343 tracheostomies during the study period. One-year mortality following tracheostomy was high, 46.5%. Older adults (≥ 65 yr) had significantly higher mortality compared with younger patients (< 65 yr) (54.7% vs 36.5%; p < 0.0001). Median survival for older adults was 175 days (95% CI, 150-202 d) compared with greater than 1 year for younger adults (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.14-1.36). Within 1 year of tracheostomy, 60.3% of patients required hospital readmission. Older adults were more likely to be readmitted in the first year after tracheostomy compared with younger adults (66.1% vs 55.2%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09-1.29). Total short-term acute care hospital costs (index and readmissions) in the first year after tracheostomy were high (mean, $215,369; SD, $160,874).

CONCLUSIONS:

Long-term outcomes following tracheostomy are extremely poor with high mortality, morbidity, and healthcare resource utilization especially among older patients. Some subsets of younger patients may have better outcomes compared with the general tracheostomy population. Short-term acute care costs were extremely high in the first year following tracheostomy. If extended to the entire U.S. population, total short-term acute care hospital costs approach $11 billion dollars per year for tracheostomy-related to acute respiratory failure. These findings may aid families and surrogates in the decision-making process.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center