Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Bone. 2019 Oct;127:577-591. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.07.022. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

Transcriptional profiling of intramembranous and endochondral ossification after fracture in mice.

Author information

1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America. Electronic address: bcoates@wustl.edu.
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
3
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
4
Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.

Abstract

Bone fracture repair represents an important clinical challenge with nearly 1 million non-union fractures occurring annually in the U.S. Gene expression differs between non-union and healthy repair, suggesting there is a pattern of gene expression that is indicative of optimal repair. Despite this, the gene expression profile of fracture repair remains incompletely understood. In this work, we used RNA-seq of two well-established murine fracture models to describe gene expression of intramembranous and endochondral bone formation. We used top differentially expressed genes, enriched gene ontology terms and pathways, callus cellular phenotyping, and histology to describe and contrast these bone formation processes across time. Intramembranous repair, as modeled by ulnar stress fracture, and endochondral repair, as modeled by femur full fracture, exhibited vastly different transcriptional profiles throughout repair. Stress fracture healing had enriched differentially expressed genes associated with bone repair and osteoblasts, highlighting the strong osteogenic repair process of this model. Interestingly, the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway was one of only a few pathways uniquely enriched in stress fracture repair. Full fracture repair involved a higher level of inflammatory and immune cell related genes than did stress fracture repair. Full fracture repair also differed from stress fracture in a robust downregulation of ion channel genes following injury, the role of which in fracture repair is unclear. This study offers a broad description of gene expression in intramembranous and endochondral ossification across several time points throughout repair and suggests several potentially intriguing genes, pathways, and cells whose role in fracture repair requires further study.

KEYWORDS:

Animal models; Bone; Fracture repair; Transcriptome

PMID:
31369916
PMCID:
PMC6708791
[Available on 2020-10-01]
DOI:
10.1016/j.bone.2019.07.022

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center