Send to

Choose Destination
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Sep;14(5):765-777. doi: 10.1177/1745691619855637. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

Deconstructing and Reconstructing Resilience: A Dynamic Network Approach.

Author information

1 Deutsches Resilienz Zentrum, Mainz, Germany.
2 Neuroimaging Center, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz.
3 Department of Methodology and Statistics, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University.
4 Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg.
5 Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge.
6 Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam.
7 Institute of Physics, University of Freiburg.
8 Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg.
9 Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, University of Freiburg.
10 Division of Mind and Brain Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin.


Resilience is still often viewed as a unitary personality construct that, as a kind of antinosological entity, protects individuals against stress-related mental problems. However, increasing evidence indicates that maintaining mental health in the face of adversity results from complex and dynamic processes of adaptation to stressors that involve the activation of several separable protective factors. Such resilience factors can reside at biological, psychological, and social levels and may include stable predispositions (such as genotype or personality traits) and malleable properties, skills, capacities, or external circumstances (such as gene-expression patterns, emotion-regulation abilities, appraisal styles, or social support). We abandon the notion of resilience as an entity here. Starting from a conceptualization of psychiatric disorders as dynamic networks of interacting symptoms that may be driven by stressors into stable maladaptive states of disease, we deconstruct the maintenance of mental health during stressor exposure into time-variant dampening influences of resilience factors onto these symptom networks. Resilience factors are separate additional network nodes that weaken symptom-symptom interconnections or symptom autoconnections, thereby preventing maladaptive system transitions. We argue that these hybrid symptom-and-resilience-factor networks provide a promising new way of unraveling the complex dynamics of mental health.


dynamic system; emotion regulation; mental health; resilience; stress; symptom network


Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center