Wearing body armour and backpack loads increase the likelihood of expiratory flow limitation and respiratory muscle fatigue during marching

Ergonomics. 2019 Sep;62(9):1181-1192. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1629638. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

Abstract

The effect of load carriage on pulmonary function was investigated during a treadmill march of increasing intensity. 24 male infantry soldiers marched on six occasions wearing either: no load, 15 kg, 30 kg, 40 kg or 50 kg. Each loaded configuration included body armour which was worn as battle-fit or loose-fit (40 kg only). FVC and FEV1 were reduced by 6 to 15% with load. Maximal mouth pressures were reduced post load carriage by up to 11% (inspiratory) and 17% (expiratory). Increased ventilatory demands associated with carrying increased mass were met by increases in breathing frequency (from 3 to 26 breaths·min-1) with minimal changes to tidal volume. 72% of participants experienced expiratory flow limitation whilst wearing the heaviest load. Loosening the armour had minimal effects on pulmonary function. It was concluded that as mass and exercise intensity are increased, the degree of expiratory flow limitation also increases. Practitioner Summary: This study investigated the effect of soldier load carriage on pulmonary function, to inform the trade-off between protection and burden. Load carriage caused an inefficient breathing pattern, respiratory muscle fatigue and expiratory flow limitation during marching. These effects were exacerbated by increases in mass carried and march intensity.

Keywords: Load carriage; fit; operating lung volumes; pulmonary function.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Military Personnel
  • Muscle Fatigue
  • Protective Clothing / adverse effects*
  • Pulmonary Ventilation
  • Respiratory Muscles
  • Sports Equipment / adverse effects*
  • Walking / physiology*
  • Weight-Bearing / physiology*
  • Young Adult