Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Tob Control. 2019 Jul 30. pii: tobaccocontrol-2019-055066. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055066. [Epub ahead of print]

Tobacco control in Nepal during a time of government turmoil (1960-2006).

Author information

1
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
2
Global Cancer Program, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
3
School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA.
4
Center for Tobacco Control, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.
5
Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
6
Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Stanton.Glantz@ucsf.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Nepal was a monarchy, then a dictatorship, then a democracy. This paper reviews how tobacco control progressed in Nepal in the context of these changes in government from 1950 through 2006.

METHODS:

We triangulated tobacco industry documents, newspaper articles and key informant interviews.

RESULTS:

Until 1983, the tobacco industry was mostly state owned. Transnational tobacco companies entered the Nepalese market through ventures with Surya Tobacco Company Private Limited (with Imperial Tobacco Company and British American Tobacco) in 1983 and Seti Cigarette Factory Limited (with Philip Morris International [PMI]) in 1985. Seminars and conferences on tobacco, celebrations of World No Tobacco Day (WNTD) and efforts by WHO helped promote tobacco control in Nepal beginning in the 1970s. Tobacco advocates in Nepal pushed the government to issue executive orders banning smoking in public places in 1992 and tobacco advertising in electronic media in 1998, and to introduce a tobacco health tax in 1993. The tobacco industry lobbied against these measures and succeeded in keeping the tobacco tax low by challenging it in court. Tobacco advocates sued the government in 2003 and 2005, resulting in a June 2006 Supreme Court decision upholding the smoking and advertising bans and requiring the government to enact a comprehensive tobacco control law.

CONCLUSIONS:

Political instability, conflict, weak governance and the dictatorship significantly affect tobacco control activities in low-income and middle-income countries. Nepal shows that tobacco control advocates can take advantage of global events, such as WNTD, and use domestic litigation to maintain support from civil societies and to advocate for stronger tobacco control policies.

KEYWORDS:

advocacy; litigation; low/middle income country; tobacco industry; tobacco industry documents

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center