Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Nucl Med. 2019 Oct;44(10):784-788. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002747.

The Use of Random Forests to Classify Amyloid Brain PET.

Author information

1
From the University of Toronto, Toronto.
2
McMaster University, Hamilton.
3
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
4
University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
5
Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON.
6
Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC.
7
Western University, London, ON.
8
Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC.
9
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
10
Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB.
11
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
12
Université Laval, Québec, QC.
13
Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, QC.
14
Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC.
15
Department of Medicine (Neurology), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To evaluate random forests (RFs) as a supervised machine learning algorithm to classify amyloid brain PET as positive or negative for amyloid deposition and identify key regions of interest for stratification.

METHODS:

The data set included 57 baseline F-florbetapir (Amyvid; Lilly, Indianapolis, IN) brain PET scans in participants with severe white matter disease, presenting with either transient ischemic attack/lacunar stroke or mild cognitive impairment from early Alzheimer disease, enrolled in a multicenter prospective observational trial. Scans were processed using the MINC toolkit to generate SUV ratios, normalized to cerebellar gray matter, and clinically read by 2 nuclear medicine physicians with interpretation based on consensus (35 negative, 22 positive). SUV ratio data and clinical reads were used for supervised training of an RF classifier programmed in MATLAB.

RESULTS:

A 10,000-tree RF, each tree using 15 randomly selected cases and 20 randomly selected features (SUV ratio per region of interest), with 37 cases for training and 20 cases for testing, had sensitivity = 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42%-100%), specificity = 92% (CI, 64%-100%), and classification accuracy = 90% (CI, 68%-99%). The most common features at the root node (key regions for stratification) were (1) left posterior cingulate (1039 trees), (2) left middle frontal gyrus (1038 trees), (3) left precuneus (857 trees), (4) right anterior cingulate gyrus (655 trees), and (5) right posterior cingulate (588 trees).

CONCLUSIONS:

Random forests can classify brain PET as positive or negative for amyloid deposition and suggest key clinically relevant, regional features for classification.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center