Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Aug 7;14(8):1200-1212. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00290119. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

Expanded Prospective Payment System and Use of and Outcomes with Home Dialysis by Race and Ethnicity in the United States.

Author information

1
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California; jshen@labiomed.org.
2
Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
3
Section of Nephrology and Selzman Institute for Kidney Health and Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
4
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California.
5
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; and.
6
Health Services Research Unit, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:

We investigated whether the recent growth in home dialysis use was proportional among all racial/ethnic groups and also whether there were changes in racial/ethnic differences in home dialysis outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS:

This observational cohort study of US Renal Data System patients initiating dialysis from 2005 to 2013 used logistic regression to estimate racial/ethnic differences in home dialysis initiation over time, and used competing risk models to assess temporal changes in racial/ethnic differences in home dialysis outcomes, specifically: (1) transfer to in-center hemodialysis (HD), (2) mortality, and (3) transplantation.

RESULTS:

Of the 523,526 patients initiating dialysis from 2005 to 2013, 55% were white, 28% black, 13% Hispanic, and 4% Asian. In the earliest era (2005-2007), 8.0% of white patients initiated dialysis with home modalities, as did a similar proportion of Asians (9.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.86 to 1.05), whereas lower proportions of black [5.2%; aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.76] and Hispanic (5.7%; aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.93) patients did so. Over time, home dialysis use increased in all groups and racial/ethnic differences decreased (2011-2013: 10.6% of whites, 8.3% of blacks [aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.85], 9.6% of Hispanics [aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.00], 14.2% of Asians [aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.12]). Compared with white patients, the risk of transferring to in-center HD was higher in blacks, similar in Hispanics, and lower in Asians; these differences remained stable over time. The mortality rate was lower for minority patients than for white patients; this difference increased over time. Transplantation rates were lower for blacks and similar for Hispanics and Asians; over time, the difference in transplantation rates between blacks and Hispanics versus whites increased.

CONCLUSIONS:

From 2005 to 2013, as home dialysis use increased, racial/ethnic differences in initiating home dialysis narrowed, without worsening rates of death or transfer to in-center HD in minority patients, as compared with white patients.

KEYWORDS:

Asian Continental Ancestry Group; Cohort Studies; Ethnic Groups; European Continental Ancestry Group; Hemodialysis, Home; Hispanic Americans; Logistic Models; Odds Ratio; Prospective Payment System; disparities; ethnicity; home dialysis; modality selection; outcomes; peritoneal dialysis; race; renal dialysis; technique failure; temporal trends

Comment in

PMID:
31320318
PMCID:
PMC6682814
[Available on 2020-08-07]
DOI:
10.2215/CJN.00290119

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire
Loading ...
Support Center