Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Epilepsia. 2019 Aug;60(8):e88-e92. doi: 10.1111/epi.16289. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

The difficulty of diagnosing NCSE in clinical practice; external validation of the Salzburg criteria.

Author information

1
Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
2
Department of Neurology, Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe & Maastricht UMC+, Heeze, The Netherlands.

Abstract

To improve the diagnostic accuracy of electroencephalography (EEG) criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), external validation of the recently proposed Salzburg criteria is paramount. We performed an external, retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study of the Salzburg criteria, using EEG recordings from patients with and without a clinical suspicion of having NCSE. Of the 191 EEG recordings, 12 (12%) was classified as an NCSE according to the reference standard. In the validation cohort, sensitivity was 67% and specificity was 89%. The positive predictive value was 47% and the negative predictive value was 95%. Ten patients in the control group (n = 93) were false positive, resulting in a specificity of 89.2%. The interrater agreement between the reference standards and between the scorers of the Salzburg criteria was moderate; disagreement occurred mainly in patients with an epileptic encephalopathy. The Salzburg criteria showed a lower diagnostic accuracy in our external validation study than in the original design, suggesting that they cannot replace the current practice of careful weighing of both clinical and EEG information on an individual basis.

KEYWORDS:

clinical study; diagnostic accuracy; epilepsy; nonconvulsive status epilepticus

PMID:
31318040
DOI:
10.1111/epi.16289

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center