Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jun 28. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0103. [Epub ahead of print]

Technical Note: Are Currently Used Measurements of Fluorescence Intensity in Near Infrared Fluorescence Imaging During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Comparable?

Author information

1
1 Department of Surgery, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
2
2 School of Nutrition, Toxicology, and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
3
3 Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
4
4 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
5
5 IMEC The Netherlands, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Aims: To investigate whether different calculation methods to express fluorescence intensity (FI) as target-to-background (BG) ratio are comparable and which method(s) match with human perception. Materials and Methods: Comparison of three calculation methods from current literature (OsiriX®, ImageJ®, and Photoshop®) to objectify FI during laparoscopic cholecystectomy measured at the exact same locations within recorded images of two categories: ex vivo and in vivo. Currently applied formulas to present FI in relation to the BG signal are compared with the subjective assessment by the human observers. These three formulas are Signal contrast = (FI in fluorescence regions-FI in BG)/255; Target-to-background ratio = (FI of target-FI of BG)/FI of BG; Signal-to-background ratio = FI of cystic duct/FI of liver and Target-to-background ratio = (FI of target-noise)/(FI of BG-noise). Results: In our evaluation OsiriX and ImageJ provided similar results, whereas OsiriX values were structurally slightly lower compared with ImageJ. Values obtained through Photoshop were less evidently related to those obtained with OsiriX and ImageJ. The formula Target-to-background ratio = (FI of target-noise)/(FI of BG-noise) was less corresponding with human perception compared with the other used formulas. Conclusions: FI results based on measurements using the programs OsiriX and ImageJ are similar, allowing for comparison of results between these programs. Results using Photoshop differ significantly, making direct comparison impossible. This is an important finding when interpreting study results. We propose to report both target and BG FI in articles, so that proper interpretation between articles can be made.

KEYWORDS:

NIRF; indocyanine green; near infrared fluorescence

PMID:
31259650
DOI:
10.1089/lap.2019.0103

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center