Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jul;20(7):28-38. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12651. Epub 2019 Jun 29.

Measurement validation of treatment planning for a MR-Linac.

Author information

1
Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

The magnetic field can cause a nonnegligible dosimetric effect in an MR-Linac system. This effect should be accurately accounted for by the beam models in treatment planning systems (TPS). The purpose of the study was to verify the beam model and the entire treatment planning and delivery process for a 1.5 T MR-Linac based on comprehensive dosimetric measurements and end-to-end tests.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Dosimetry measurements and end-to-end tests were performed on a preclinical MR-Linac (Elekta AB) using a multitude of detectors and were compared to the corresponding beam model calculations from the TPS for the MR-Linac. Measurement devices included ion chambers (IC), diamond detector, radiochromic film, and MR-compatible ion chamber array and diode array. The dose in inhomogeneous phantom was also verified. The end-to-end tests include the generation, delivery, and comparison of 3D and IMRT plan with measurement.

RESULTS:

For the depth dose measurements with Farmer IC, micro IC and diamond detector, the absolute difference between most measurement points and beam model calculation beyond the buildup region were <1%, at most 2% for a few measurement points. For the beam profile measurements, the absolute differences were no more than 1% outside the penumbra region and no more than 2.5% inside the penumbra region. Results of end-to-end tests demonstrated that three 3D static plans with single 5 × 10 cm2 fields (at gantry angle 0°, 90° and 270°) and two IMRT plans successfully passed gamma analysis with clinical criteria. The dose difference in the inhomogeneous phantom between the calculation and measurement was within 1.0%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both relative and absolute dosimetry measurements agreed well with the TPS calculation, indicating that the beam model for MR-Linac properly accounts for the magnetic field effect. The end-to-end tests verified the entire treatment planning process.

KEYWORDS:

MR-Linac; MR-guided RT; beam model verification; electron returning effect; treatment planning system

PMID:
31254376
PMCID:
PMC6612768
DOI:
10.1002/acm2.12651
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center