Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 25. pii: ciz545. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz545. [Epub ahead of print]

Procalcitonin to distinguish viral from bacterial pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
2
Dan L Duncan Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
3
Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston.

Abstract

Because of the diverse etiologies of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and the limitations of current diagnostic modalities, serum procalcitonin levels have been proposed as a novel tool to guide antibiotic therapy. Outcome data from procalcitonin-guided therapy trials have shown similar mortality, but the essential question is whether the sensitivity and specificity of procalcitonin levels enable the practitioner to distinguish bacterial pneumonia, which requires antibiotic therapy, from viral pneumonia, which does not. In this meta-analysis of 12 studies of 2,408 patients with CAP, that included etiologic diagnoses and sufficient data to enable analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of serum procalcitonin were 0.55 (95% CI = 0.37, 0.71; I2 = 95.5%) and 0.76 (95% CI = 0.62, 0.86; I2 = 94.1%), respectively. Thus, a procalcitonin level is unlikely to provide reliable evidence either to mandate administration of antibiotics or to enable withholding such treatment in patients with CAP.

KEYWORDS:

pneumonia; procalcitonin; sensitivity; specificity

PMID:
31241140
DOI:
10.1093/cid/ciz545

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center