Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun 22. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01082-x. [Epub ahead of print]

The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review.

Author information

1
Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
2
Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. caroline.vass@manchester.ac.uk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Technological progress has led to changes in the antenatal screening programmes, most significantly the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). The availability of a new type of testing changes the type of information that the parent(s) require before, during and after screening to mitigate anxiety about the testing process and results.

OBJECTIVES:

To identify the extent to which economic evaluations of NIPT have accounted for the need to provide information alongside testing and the associated costs and health outcomes of information provision.

METHODS:

A systematic review of economic evaluations of NIPTs (up to February 2018) was conducted. Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO were searched using an electronic search strategy combining a published economic search filter (from NHS economic evaluations database) with terms related to NIPT and screening-related technologies. Data were extracted using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards framework and the results were summarised as part of a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS:

A total of 12 economic evaluations were identified. The majority of evaluations (n = 10; 83.3%) involved cost effectiveness analysis. Only four studies (33.3%) included the cost of providing information about NIPT in their economic evaluation. Two studies considered the impact of test results on parents' quality of life by allowing utility decrements for different outcomes. Some studies suggested that the challenges of valuing information prohibited their inclusion in an economic evaluation.

CONCLUSION:

Economic evaluations of NIPTs need to account for the costs and outcomes associated with information provision, otherwise estimates of cost effectiveness may prove inaccurate.

KEYWORDS:

Aneuploidy; Cost effectiveness; Down’s syndrome; Information; NIPT; Prenatal testing

PMID:
31230226
DOI:
10.1007/s10198-019-01082-x

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center