Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Gen Psychiatr. 2019 Apr 15;32(2):e100019. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2018-100019. eCollection 2019.

Assessing the severity of methamphetamine use disorder beyond the subjective craving report: the role of an attention bias test.

Author information

1
The Laboratory for Affect Cognition and Regulation (ACRLab), Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education (SWU), Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
2
Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
3
Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
4
Da Lian Shan Institute of Addiction Rehabilitation, Nanjing, China.

Abstract

Background:

Methamphetamine (MA) is one of the most commonly abused illicit psychostimulant drugs and MA use disorder constitutes a universal health concern across the world. Despite many intervention approaches to MA use disorder, the indicator of addiction severity is mainly limited to subjective craving score to drug-related cues, which is influenced by many factors such as social approval and self-masking.

Aim:

The present study investigates whether self-reported craving for drug use in response to MA cues is a reliable indicator for addiction severity in MA users, and then tests the validity of the cue-induced attention bias test in addiction severity assessment.

Methods:

Fifty-two male MA users completed the cue-induced craving test and attention bias task, and were required to report clinical characteristics of addiction severity. For the attention bias test, subjects were required to discriminate the letter superimposed onto MA use-related or neutral scenes. The reaction time delay during MA-use condition relative to neutral condition was used as an index of the attention bias.

Results:

The results showed that 24 of the 52 MA users rated non-zero in cue-induced craving test, and they showed a significant attention bias to drug-related pictures. However, the other 28 users who rated zero in cue-induced craving evaluation showed a similar attention bias to drug-related cues. In addition, the attention bias to MA use-related cues was significantly and positively correlated with the clinical indexes of addiction severity, but the relationship was absent between subjective craving evaluation and the indexes of addiction severity.

Conclusion:

These results suggest that attention bias to MA cues may be a more reliable indicator than experiential craving report, especially when subjective craving is measured in the compulsory rehabilitation centre.

KEYWORDS:

addiction severity; methamphetamine; subjective craving

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center