Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:277-288. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

Incorporating behavioral variables into crash count prediction by severity: A multivariate multiple risk source approach.

Author information

1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA. Electronic address: mshaon@uwm.edu.
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA. Electronic address: qinx@uwm.edu.
3
School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia. Electronic address: a.afghari@qut.edu.au.
4
School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture, and Information Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. Electronic address: hos@civil.uq.edu.au.
5
School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia. Electronic address: m1.haque@qut.edu.au.

Abstract

The frequency and severity of traffic crashes have commonly been used as indicators of crash risk on transport networks. Comprehensive modeling of crash risk should account for both frequency and injury severity-capturing both the extent and intensity of transport risk for designing effective safety improvement programs. Previous research has revealed that crashes are correlated across severity categories because of the combined influence of risk factors, observed or unobserved. Moreover, crashes are the outcomes of a multitude of factors related to roadway design, traffic operations, pavement conditions, driver behavior, human factors, and environmental characteristics, or in more general terms: factors reflect both engineering and non-engineering risk sources. Perhaps not surprisingly, engineering risk sources have dominated the list of variables in the mainstream modeling of crashes whereas non-engineering sources, in particular, behavioral factors, are crucially omitted. It is plausible to assume that crash contributing factors from the same risk source affect crashes in a similar manner, but their influences vary across different risk sources. Conventional crash frequency modeling hypothesizes that the total crash count at any roadway site is well-approximated by a single risk source to which several explanatory variables contribute collaboratively. The conventional formulation is not capable of accounting for variations between risk sources; therefore, is unable to discriminate distinct impacts between engineering variables and non-engineering variables. To address this shortcoming, this study contributes to the development of multivariate multiple risk source regression, a robust modeling technique to model crash frequency and severity simultaneously. The multivariate multiple risk source regression method applied in this study can effectively capture the correlation between severity levels of crash counts while identifyinging the varying effects of crash contributing factors originated from distinct sources. Using crashes on Wisconsin rural two-lane highways, two risk sources - engineering and behavioral - were employed to develop proposed models. The modeling results were compared with a single equation negative binomial (NB) model, and a univariate multiple risk source model. The results show that the multivariate multiple risk source model significantly outperforms the other models in terms of statistical fit across several measures. The study demonstrates a unique approach to explicitly incorporating behavioral factors into crash prediction models while taking crash severity into consideration. More importantly, the parameter estimates provide more insight into the distinct sources of crash risk, which can be used to further inform safety practitioners and guide roadway improvement programs.

KEYWORDS:

Crash causation mechanism; Driver behavioral factors; Multiple risk generating process; Multivariate analysis

PMID:
31177039
DOI:
10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.010

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center