Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jun 6. pii: bjsports-2018-099747. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099747. [Epub ahead of print]

How strong is the evidence that conservative treatment reduces pain and improves function in individuals with patellar tendinopathy? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials including GRADE recommendations.

Author information

1
Physical Therapy Department, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil lucianademichelis@yahoo.com.br.
2
Programa de Pós Graduação em Reabilitação e Desempenho Funcional, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil.
3
Physical Therapy Department, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
4
Department of Sport and Exercise Medicine, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
5
School of Public Health - Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the effectiveness of conservative treatment (CT) on pain and function in patients with patellar tendinopathy (PT) compared with minimal intervention (MI) or other invasive intervention, or in addition to decline eccentric squat.

METHODS:

Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and AMED databases. All randomised trials that evaluated CT (any intervention not involving invasive procedures or medication) in individuals with PT were included. Two reviewers screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of all included studies. Where suitable, meta-analyses were conducted; we assessed certainty of the evidence using GRADE methodology.

RESULTS:

When compared with MI, CT did not improve pain (weighted mean difference (WMD) -2.6, 95% CI -6.5 to 1.2) or function (WMD 1.8, 95% CI -2.4 to 6.1) in the short-term (up to 3 months) follow-up. When compared with invasive intervention, CT did not improve pain (WMD 0.7, 95% CI -0.1 to 1.4) or function (WMD -6.6, 95% CI -13.3 to 0.2) in the short-term follow-up. No overall effects were found for combined CT (when a conservative intervention was added to decline eccentric squat) on pain (WMD -0.5, 95% CI -1.4 to 0.4) or function (WMD -2.3, 95 % -9.1 to 4.6) at short-term follow-up. Single studies showed an effect on pain with iontophoresis at short-term follow-up (d = 2.42) or dry needling at medium/long-term follow-up (d = 1.17) and function with exercise intervention at medium/long-term follow-up (over 3 months) (d = 0.83).

SUMMARY/CONCLUSION:

Our estimates of treatment effect have only low to very low certainty evidence to support them. This field of sports medicine/sports physiotherapy urgently needs larger, high-quality studies with pain and function among the potential primary outcomes.

KEYWORDS:

injury; intervention; knee; tendon

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Publication type

Publication type

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire
Loading ...
Support Center