Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1441-1451. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05026-2. Epub 2019 May 29.

The Impact of Breast Density Notification Laws on Supplemental Breast Imaging and Breast Biopsy.

Author information

1
Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
2
Division of Women's Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
3
Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
4
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. keating@hcp.med.harvard.edu.
5
Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. keating@hcp.med.harvard.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Dense breast tissue increases breast cancer risk and lowers mammography sensitivity, but the value of supplemental imaging for dense breasts remains uncertain. Since 2009, 37 states and Washington DC have passed legislation requiring patient notification about breast density.

OBJECTIVE:

Examine the effects of state breast density notification laws on use of supplemental breast imaging and breast biopsies.

DESIGN:

Difference-in-differences analysis of supplemental imaging and biopsies before and after notification laws in 12 states enacting breast density notification laws from 2009 to 2014 and 12 matched control states. Supplemental imaging/biopsy within 6 months following an index mammogram were evaluated during four time periods related to legislation: (1) 6 months before, (2) 0-6 months after, (3) 6-12 months after, and (4) 12-18 months after.

PARTICIPANTS:

Women ages 40-64 years receiving an initial mammogram in a state that passed a breast density notification law or a control state.

INTERVENTION:

Mandatory breast density notification following an index mammogram.

MAIN MEASURES:

Use of breast biopsies and supplemental breast imaging (breast ultrasound, tomosynthesis, magnetic resonance imaging, scintimammography, and thermography), overall and by specific test.

KEY RESULTS:

Supplemental breast imaging and biopsy increased modestly in states with notification laws and changed minimally in control states. Adjusted rates of supplemental imaging and biopsy within 6 months of mammography before legislation were 8.5% and 3.1%, respectively. Compared with pre-legislation in intervention and control states, legislation was associated with adjusted difference-in-differences estimates of + 1.3% (p < 0.0001) and + 0.4% (p < 0.0001) for supplemental imaging and biopsies, respectively, in the 6-12 months after the law and difference-in-differences estimates of + 3.3% (p < 0.0001) and + 0.8% (p < 0.0001) for supplemental imaging and biopsies, respectively, 12-18 months after the law.

CONCLUSIONS:

As breast density notification laws are considered, policymakers and clinicians should expect increases in breast imaging/biopsies. Additional research is needed on these laws' effects on cost and patient outcomes.

KEYWORDS:

breast cancer; cancer screening; health communication; health policy; health services research

PMID:
31144277
PMCID:
PMC6667574
[Available on 2020-08-01]
DOI:
10.1007/s11606-019-05026-2

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center