Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J R Army Med Corps. 2019 May 24. pii: jramc-2018-001102. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2018-001102. [Epub ahead of print]

Is E-FAST possible and useful on the battlefield? A feasibility study during medical courses in hostile environment (MEDICHOS): preliminary results.

Author information

1
Service des urgences, HIA Sainte Anne, Toulon, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France aurelien.renard211@orange.fr.
2
Service des urgences, HIA Sainte Anne, Toulon, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France.
3
Service Anesthesie et réanimation, HIA Sainte Anne, Toulon Armees, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France.
4
Service Médical du Bataillon des Marins Pompiers de Marseille, Marseille, France.
5
Division Opérations, Etat-Major Opérationnel Santé, Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des Armées, Paris, France.
6
2ème Centre Médical des Armées, 12ème Antenne Médicale-Ecole du Val de Grâce, Paris, France.
7
Reanimation, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon-La Seyne-sur-Mer, Toulon, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

The extent of the French forces' territory in the Sahel band generates long medical evacuations. In case of many victims, to respect the golden hour rule, first-line sorting is essential. Through simulation situations, the aim of our study was to assess whether the use of ultrasound was useful to military doctors.

METHODS:

In combat-like exercise conditions, we provided trainees with a pocket-size ultrasound. Every patient for whom the trainees chose to perform ultrasound in role 1 was included. An extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (E-FAST) was performed with six basic sonographic views. We evaluated whether these reference views were obtained or not. Once obtained by the trainees, pathological views corresponding to the scenario were shown to assess whether the trainees modified their therapeutic management strategy and their priorities.

RESULTS:

168 patients were treated by 15 different trainee doctors. Of these 168 patients, ultrasound (E-FAST or point-of-care ultrasound) was performed on 44 (26%) of them. In 51% (n=20/39) of the situations, the practitioners considered that the realisation of ultrasound had a significant impact in terms of therapeutic and evacuation priorities. More specifically, it changed therapeutic decisions in 67% of time (n=26/39) and evacuation priorities in 72% of time (n=28/39).

CONCLUSION:

This original work showed that ultrasound on the battlefield was possible and useful. To confirm these results, ultrasound needs to be democratised and assessed in a real operational environment.

KEYWORDS:

battlefield; military medicine; triage; ultrasound

PMID:
31129648
DOI:
10.1136/jramc-2018-001102

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire
Loading ...
Support Center