Send to

Choose Destination
Hum Mov Sci. 2019 May 22;66:292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.05.004. [Epub ahead of print]

Body configuration as a predictor of centre of mass displacement in a forward reactive step.

Author information

Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada. Electronic address:


In balance perturbations that elicit backwards reactive steps, body configuration at stepping contact is related to likelihood of balance recovery. However, less is known about the relationship between body configuration (at stepping contact) and underlying centre of mass (COM) dynamics during dynamic perturbations requiring a forward reactive step. Accordingly, the primary objective of this study was to characterize the potential relationships between body configuration and COM displacement during simulated trips. Towards determining the robustness of these relationships, trips were simulated in both baseline and increased passive joint stiffness conditions. Sixteen healthy adults participated in this study. Trips were simulated using a tether release paradigm where participants were suddenly released, necessitating a forward step (onto a force plate) to recover their balance. Trials were performed in a baseline unconstrained condition, and in a 'corset' condition to increase passive stiffness of the trunk and hips. In all trials, whole body kinematics and kinetics were collected. Multiple linear regression models were run to assess the relationship of body angles to COM displacement in both the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) planes. Regression models showed a significant association of sagittal plane body configuration to both COM displacement at stepping contact and maximum COM displacement in the AP plane. Across models, the strongest predictor was the trail leg angle. Associations were stronger in the increased passive stiffness condition (average R2 = 0.366) compared to the baseline condition (average R2 = 0.266). Poor association of body configuration to COM displacement was found in the ML plane. The significant associations observed between body configuration and COM dynamics in simulated trips supports the potential downstream application of these models in identifying individuals with impaired balance control and increased fall risk.


Artificial stiffness; Balance; Falls; Postural perturbation; Reactive stepping; Trip

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center