Send to

Choose Destination
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 May 22. doi: 10.1111/acem.13805. [Epub ahead of print]

Multicenter Comparison of Non-supine versus Supine Positioning During Intubation in the Emergency Department: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study.

Author information

Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor - UCLA, Torrance, CA, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.



Head-up positioning for preoxygenation and ramping for morbidly obese patients are well accepted techniques, but the effect of head-up positioning with full torso elevation for all intubations is controversial. We compared first-pass success, adverse events, and glottic view between supine (SP) and non-supine (NSP) positioning for emergency department (ED) patients undergoing orotracheal intubation.


We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for ED intubations over a two-year period from 25 participating centers in the National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR). We compared characteristics and outcomes for adult patients intubated orotracheally in SP and NSP positions with either a direct or video laryngoscope. We report odds ratios (OR) with 95%CI for categorical variables and interquartile ranges with 95%CI for continuous variables. Our primary outcome was first-attempt intubation success and secondary outcomes were glottic views and peri-intubation adverse events.


Of 11,480 total intubations, 5.8% were performed in NSP. The NSP group included significantly more obese patients (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.9-2.6]) and patients with a suspected difficult airway (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.6-2.2]). First-pass success (adjusted OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.9-1.4]) and overall rate of grade I glottic views (OR =1.1 [95% CI 0.9-1.2]) were similar between groups while NSP had a significantly higher rate of grade I views when direct laryngoscopy was employed (OR = 1.27 [95% CI 1.04-1.54]). NSP was associated with higher odds of any adverse event (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.1-1.7]).


ED providers utilized SP in most ED intubations but were more likely to use NSP for patients who were obese or in whom they predicted a difficult airway. We found no differences in first-pass success between groups but total adverse events were more likely in NSP. A randomized trial comparing patient positioning during intubation in the ED is warranted. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center