Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 May 16. pii: bjophthalmol-2018-313640. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313640. [Epub ahead of print]

Association between birth weight and refractive error in adulthood: a Mendelian randomisation study.

Author information

1
School of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
2
Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
3
School of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK GuggenheimJ1@cardiff.ac.uk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Pathological myopia is one of the leading causes of blindness globally. Lower birth weight (BW) within the normal range has been reported to increase the risk of myopia, although findings conflict. We sought to estimate the causal effect of BW on refractive error using Mendelian randomisation (MR), under the assumption of a linear relationship.

METHODS:

Genetic variants associated with BW were identified from meta-analysis of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for self-reported BW in 162 039 UK Biobank participants and a published Early Growth Genetics (EGG) consortium GWAS (n=26 836). We performed a one-sample MR analysis in 39 658 unrelated, adult UK Biobank participants (independent of the GWAS sample) using an allele score for BW as instrumental variable. A two-sample MR sensitivity analysis and conventional ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analyses were also undertaken.

RESULTS:

In OLS analysis, BW showed a small, positive association with refractive error: +0.04 D per SD increase in BW (95% CI 0.02 to 0.07; p=0.002). The one-sample MR-estimated causal effect of BW on refractive error was higher, at +0.28 D per SD increase in BW (95% CI 0.05 to 0.52, p=0.02). A two-sample MR analysis provided similar causal effect estimates, with minimal evidence of directional pleiotropy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study suggests lower BW within the normal range is causally associated with a more myopic refractive error. However, the impact of the causal effect was modest (range 1.00 D covering approximately 95% of the population).

KEYWORDS:

Mendelian randomisation; UK Biobank; birth weight; refractive error

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire
Loading ...
Support Center