Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Pediatr Transplant. 2019 Aug;23(5):e13455. doi: 10.1111/petr.13455. Epub 2019 May 13.

Publication trends in pediatric renal transplantation: Bibliometric analysis of literature from 1950 to 2017.

Author information

1
Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2
Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
3
Division of Urology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia.
4
Department of Urology, Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia.
5
Division of Emergency Medicine, Markham-Stouffville Hospital, Markham, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Pediatric renal transplantation has been heavily published since the 1950s. Herein, we describe the bibliometrics and impact of the 200 most-cited pediatric renal transplantation manuscripts.

METHODS:

We identified pediatric renal transplantation publications from 1900 onwards. Year, citations, h-index, geographic origin, impact factor, topic, and design of the 200 top-cited papers were extracted. Impact index was calculated, adjusting for citation volume and time since publication.

RESULTS:

Of the top 200 papers, mean citation count was 80 ± 40, impact factor 3.9 ± 3.7, h-index 35 ± 20, and impact index 25 ± 13. Studies were mostly retrospective (31%) or observational (32%). Most papers originated from the United States (58%), Germany (9%), and Italy (6%), which did not correlate with citation counts. Transplantation (18%), Pediatric Nephrology (16%), and American Journal of Transplantation (11%) had the highest publication volume, which did not correlate with citation count. The main topics were medical renal disease, drug monitoring, compliance, and viruses. Most of the top-cited papers (179; 90%) were published after 1991. The difference in the number of times cited between papers published before and after 1991 was insignificant (75 ± 24 vs 80 ± 42; P = 0.59). There was a difference in impact index for the same period (48 ± 15 vs 22 ± 10; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

The most-cited papers were concentrated in three journals, but the top three cited papers were published elsewhere. Recent publications were more cited with a higher impact than older papers. Despite the importance of surgery in transplantation, there is a paucity of high-impact papers on this topic.

KEYWORDS:

bibliometrics; citation mapping; kidney transplantation; pediatrics

PMID:
31081212
DOI:
10.1111/petr.13455

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center