Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 May-Jun;16(3):200-207.

Effect of thread depth and implant shape on stress distribution in anterior and posterior regions of mandible bone: A finite element analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani, Iraq.
2
Automated Manufacturing Engineering Department, Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering, Baghdad University, Iraq.
3
Darashishi Dental Clinical Center, School of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani, Iraq.
4
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani, Iraq.
5
Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, OH, United States of America.

Abstract

Background:

The ability of modern implant dentistry to achieve goals such as normal contour, function, comfort, esthetics, and health to totally or partially edentulous patients guaranteed it to be more effective and reliable method for the rehabilitation process of many challenging clinical situations. In regard to this, the current study evaluates the effect of changing implant shape design parameters on interface stress distribution within the mandible bone.

Materials and Methods:

A numerical procedure based on finite element (FE) method was adopted to investigate the influence of using different body design and thread depth of the inserted implant on the final stress situation. For the purpose of evaluation, a three-dimensional realistic FE models of mandible bone and inserted implant were constructed and analyzed using a pack of engineering software (Solidworks, and ANSYS). Six different commercial implant models (cylindrical and tapered) with three different V-shaped thread depths (0.25 mm, 0.35 mm, and 0.45 mm) were designed to be used in this study. The suggested implants used in this study were threaded in two different locations of mandible bone; the anterior region (Type I model) and posterior region (Type II model). A vertical static load of 250 N was directly applied to the center of the suprastructure of the implant for each model.

Results:

For both models, evaluations were achieved to figure out the stress distribution patterns and maximum equivalent von Mises. The results obtained after implementation of FE dental-implant models show that the highest stresses were located at the crestal cortical bone around the implant neck. In addition, the simulation study revealed that taper body implant had a higher peak value of von Mises stress than that of cylinder body implants in all types of bones. Moreover, a thread depth of 0.25 mm showed highest peak of maximum von Mises stresses for Type I and Type II models.

Conclusion:

The simulation results indicate that all models have the same von Mises stress distribution pattern and higher peak von Mises stresses of the cortical bone were seen in tapered implant body in contrast to the cylindrical body.

KEYWORDS:

Dental Implant-Abutment Design; finite element analysis; mandible; stress

PMID:
31040877
PMCID:
PMC6474169

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center