Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Neurosurg. 2019 Apr 26:1-13. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.JNS182025. [Epub ahead of print]

Effect of decompressive craniectomy in the postoperative expansion of traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage: a propensity score-based analysis.

Author information

1
1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Río Hortega, Valladolid.
2
3University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
3
2Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación i+12, Madrid; and.

Abstract

OBJECTIVETraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (TICH) represents approximately 13%-48% of the lesions after a traumatic brain injury (TBI), and hemorrhagic progression (HP) occurs in 38%-63% of cases. In previous studies, decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been characterized as a risk factor in the HP of TICH; however, few studies have focused exclusively on this relationship. The object of the present study was to analyze the relationship between DC and the growth of TICH and to reveal any correlation with the size of the craniectomy, degree of cerebral parenchymal herniation (CPH), or volumetric expansion of the TICH.METHODSThe authors retrospectively analyzed the records of 497 adult patients who had been consecutively admitted after suffering a severe or moderate closed TBI. An inclusion criterion was presentation with one or more TICHs on the initial or control CT. Demographic, clinical, radiological, and treatment variables were assessed for associations.RESULTSTwo hundred three patients presenting with 401 individual TICHs met the selection criteria. TICH growth was observed in 281 cases (70.1%). Eighty-two cases (20.4%) underwent craniectomy without TICH evacuation. In the craniectomy group, HP was observed in 71 cases (86.6%); in the noncraniectomy group (319 cases), HP occurred in 210 cases (65.8%). The difference in the incidence of HP between the two groups was statistically significant (OR 3.41, p < 0.01). The mean area of the craniectomy was 104.94 ± 27.5 cm2, and the mean CPH distance through the craniectomy was 17.85 ± 11.1 mm. The mean increase in the TICH volume was greater in the groups with a craniectomy area > 115 cm2 and CPH > 25 mm (16.12 and 14.47 cm3, respectively, p = 0.01 and 0.02). After calculating the propensity score (PS), the authors followed three statistical methods-matching, stratification, and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW)-thereby obtaining an adequate balance of the covariates. A statistically significant relationship was found between HP and craniectomy (OR 2.77, p = 0.004). This correlation was confirmed with the three methodologies based on the PS with odds greater than 2.CONCLUSIONSDC is a risk factor for the growth of TICH, and there is also an association between the size of the DC and the magnitude of the volume increase in the TICH.

KEYWORDS:

ASDH = acute subdural hematoma; DC = decompressive craniectomy; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; GEE = generalized estimating equation; HP = hemorrhagic progression; IPTW = inverse probability treatment weighting; PA = prothrombin activity; PS = propensity score; SMD = standardized mean differences; TBI = traumatic brain injury; TICH = traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage; aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time; contusion; decompressive craniectomy; hemorrhagic progression; trauma; traumatic brain injury; traumatic intracerebral hematoma

PMID:
31026834
DOI:
10.3171/2019.2.JNS182025

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Sheridan PubFactory
Loading ...
Support Center