Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cancer. 2019 Aug 15;125(16):2856-2860. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32142. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

Maintenance of physical activity and sedentary behavior change, and physical activity and sedentary behavior change after an abridged intervention: Secondary outcomes from the ACTIVATE Trial.

Author information

1
Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
2
Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
3
Physical Activity Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
4
Medical Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
5
Cancer Prevention Research Centre, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
6
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
7
Australian Centre for Precision Health, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
8
Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
9
Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
10
Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
11
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
12
Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

This brief report examines the maintenance of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behavior changes approximately 12 weeks after the delivery of the ACTIVATE Trial primary intervention (use of the Garmin Vivofit 2 activity tracker coupled with a behavioral feedback and goal-setting session and 5 telephone-delivered health coaching sessions). We also examine the efficacy of an abridged intervention (use of the Garmin Vivofit 2 only) in the waitlist control group.

METHODS:

A pre-post design was employed to examine the secondary aims of the ACTIVATE Trial (n = 80; mean age = 62 years). MVPA and sedentary behavior were measured using Actigraph and activPAL accelerometers after delivery of the primary intervention (T2), and again 12 weeks later (T3). Linear mixed models with random effects were used to examine within-group changes in MVPA and sitting time variables.

RESULTS:

After the 12-week follow-up period, women in the primary intervention group had maintained their higher levels of MVPA (change from T2 to T3 = 14 min/wk; 95% CI = -18 to 46; P = .37). However, their sitting time increased slightly, by 7 min/d (95% CI = -20 to 34; P = .58), but it did not return to its preintervention level. After receiving the Garmin Vivofit 2, the waitlist control group increased their MVPA by 33 min/wk (95% CI = 3-64; P = .03) and reduced their sitting time by 38 min/d (95% CI = -69 to -7; P = .02) over the same 12-week period.

CONCLUSION:

The secondary outcomes from the ACTIVATE Trial suggest that wearable technology may generate sustainable changes in MVPA and sitting time. Wearable technology alone may be sufficient to change behavior, at least in the short term.

KEYWORDS:

accelerometry; breast neoplasms; exercise; fitness trackers; sedentary lifestyle; survivors

PMID:
31012968
DOI:
10.1002/cncr.32142

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center