Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Aug;27(8):1208-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 19.

Mechanosensitive MiRs regulated by anabolic and catabolic loading of human cartilage.

Author information

1
Research Centre for Experimental Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: Nicole.Hecht@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
2
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States. Electronic address: johnstob@ohsu.edu.
3
Experimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: Peter.Angele@klinik.uni-regensburg.de.
4
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: Tilman.Walker@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
5
Research Centre for Experimental Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: wiltrud.richter@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Elucidation of whether miRs are involved in mechanotransduction pathways by which cartilage is maintained or disturbed has a particular importance in our understanding of osteoarthritis (OA) pathophysiology. The aim was to investigate whether mechanical loading influences global miR-expression in human chondrocytes and to identify mechanosensitive miRs responding to beneficial and non-beneficial loading regimes as potential to obtain valuable diagnostic or therapeutic targets to advance OA-treatment.

METHOD:

Mature tissue-engineered human cartilage was subjected to two distinct loading regimes either stimulating or suppressing proteoglycan-synthesis, before global miR microarray analysis. Promising candidate miRs were selected, re-evaluated by qRT-PCR and tested for expression in human healthy vs OA cartilage samples.

RESULTS:

After anabolic loading, miR microarray profiling revealed minor changes in miR-expression while catabolic stimulation produced a significant regulation of 80 miRs with a clear separation of control and compressed samples by hierarchical clustering. Cross-testing of selected miRs revealed that miR-221, miR-6872-3p, miR-6723-5p were upregulated by both loading conditions while others (miR-199b-5p, miR-1229-5p, miR-1275, miR-4459, miR-6891-5p, miR-7150) responded specifically after catabolic loading. Mechanosensitivity of miR-221 correlated with pERK1/2-activation induced by both loading conditions. The miR-response to loading was transient and a constitutive deregulation of mechano-miRs in OA vs healthy articular cartilage was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

MiRs with broader vs narrower mechanosensitivity were discovered and the first group of mechanosensitive miRs characteristic for non-beneficial loading was defined that may shape the proteome differentially when cartilage tissue is disturbed. The findings prompt future investigations into miR-relevance for mechano-responsive pathways and the corresponding miR-target molecules.

KEYWORDS:

Engineered cartilage; Mechanical loading; Osteoarthritis; miR-profiling

PMID:
31009748
DOI:
10.1016/j.joca.2019.04.010

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center