Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Apr 19. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00550-x. [Epub ahead of print]

Association of body mass index with cardiac resynchronization therapy intention and left ventricular lead implantation failure: insights from the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry.

Author information

1
Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
2
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
3
Division of Cardiology, Department of Electrophysiology, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
4
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
5
Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. Jonathan.Hsu@ucsd.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation involves left ventricular (LV) lead placement for biventricular pacing and is more complex than implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-only implantation. Differences in the prescription of CRT-D versus ICD may result from clinician biases based on patient body habitus, and body habitus may be associated with LV lead implantation failure.

OBJECTIVE:

We sought to evaluate whether patient body mass index (BMI) was associated with planned use and implantation failure of CRT-D therapy.

METHODS:

We studied all patients enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry who met standard CRT-D criteria and received either an ICD or CRT-D between 2010 and 2012. BMI was categorized based on World Health Organization classification. Using hierarchical logistic regression, two multivariate models adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics were fit based on the following outcome variables: (1) planned implantation with CRT-D versus ICD and (2) failed versus successful LV lead placement.

RESULTS:

Of 337,547 patients, 41,872 met inclusion criteria for the first analysis and 35,186 met criteria for the second analysis. After multivariable adjustment, patients with extreme (BMI > 40 kg/m2) obesity were less likely to receive guideline-concordant CRT-D compared with patients with normal weight (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.99; p = 0.04). Extreme (BMI > 40 kg/m2) obesity was associated with higher odds of failed LV lead placement (AOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.07-1.72, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with normal weight patients, extremely obese (BMI > 40 kg/m2) CRT-D eligible patients were less likely to be prescribed CRT-D and were at higher odds for failed LV lead placement.

KEYWORDS:

Biventricular pacing; Body mass index; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

PMID:
31004224
DOI:
10.1007/s10840-019-00550-x

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center