Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 18;8(4). pii: E536. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040536.

Short-Term Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Endurance and Maximal Force Production. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia 30107, Spain. calix@alu.ucam.edu.
2
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia 30107, Spain. sromero@ucam.edu.
3
Department of Physical Education, University of A Coruña, La Coruña 15279, Spain. marcoscastroalonso@gmail.com.
4
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia 30107, Spain. dcolomer@ucam.edu.
5
Department of Physical Education, University of A Coruña, La Coruña 15279, Spain. ganceus@gmail.com.
6
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia 30107, Spain. ajerez@alu.ucam.edu.
7
Department of Physical Education, University of A Coruña, La Coruña 15279, Spain. mafo73@gmail.com.
8
Department of Education, King Juan Carlos University, Madrid 28933, Spain. mafo73@gmail.com.
9
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia 30107, Spain. gmarquez@ucam.edu.

Abstract

The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on endurance (i.e., time to task failure (TTF)) and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Furthermore, we aimed to analyze whether the duration of stimulation, the brain region targeted for stimulation, and the task performed could also influence motor performance. We performed a systematic literature review in the databases MEDLINE and Web of Science. The short-term effects of anodal tDCS and sham stimulation (placebo) were considered as experimental and control conditions, respectively. A total of 31 interventions were included (MVC = 13; TTF = 18). Analysis of the strength-related tDCS studies showed small improvements in the MVC (SMD = 0.19; 95% CI = -0.02, 0.41; p = 0.08). However, the results of the endurance-related interventions indicated a moderate effect on TTF performance (SMD = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.45; p = 0.008). Furthermore, the sub-analysis showed that anodal tDCS over M1 and stimulation durations longer than 10 min produced the best results in terms of TTF performance enhancement. Additionally, the effects of anodal tDCS were larger during full body exercises (i.e., cycling) when compared to uniarticular tasks. In conclusion, the current meta-analysis indicated that anodal tDCS leads to small and moderate effects on MVC and TTF, respectively.

KEYWORDS:

Non-invasive brain stimulation; maximal voluntary contraction; prefrontal cortex; primary motor cortex; time to task failure

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center