Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Spine J. 2019 Aug;19(8):1310-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

Supervised physical therapy vs. home exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Author information

1
Spine Care Center, Wakayama Medical University Kihoku Hospital, 219 Myoji, Katsuragi-cho, Ito-gun, Wakayama 649-7113, Japan. Electronic address: masakazumasakazu910@gmail.com.
2
Spine Care Center, Wakayama Medical University Kihoku Hospital, 219 Myoji, Katsuragi-cho, Ito-gun, Wakayama 649-7113, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT:

Exercise has been reported to improve short-term outcomes for patients with LSS in terms of disability and back and leg pain. However, no studies have compared supervised exercise with unsupervised exercise or quantified physical activity using a pedometer to confirm compliance with a home exercise program.

PURPOSE:

To compare the effectiveness of supervised physical therapy (PT) with unsupervised exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING:

A single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

PATIENT SAMPLE:

Patients presenting with symptoms of neurogenic claudication caused by LSS, which was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging.

OUTCOME MEASURES:

The primary outcome was improvement in symptom severity scores on the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included physical function on the ZCQ, self-paced walking test (SPWT) performance, pain indicated using a numerical rating scale (NRS), and the number of daily steps measured by pedometer.

METHODS:

Patients with LSS were randomized to a PT group, who performed supervised PT twice a week for 6 weeks, or a home exercise (HE) group. PT sessions included manual therapy, individually tailored stretching and strengthening exercises, cycling, and body weight-supported treadmill walking.

RESULTS:

Forty-three patients were randomly allocated to the PT group and 43 patients to the HE group. Compared with the HE group, the PT group had greater percentage of responders achieving minimum clinically important difference in ZCQ symptom severity (difference for percentage between groups [95%confidence interval], 30.2% [9.1-48.6], p=.01), ZCQ physical function (32.6% [11.6-50.6], p<.01), walking distance on the SPWT (39.5% [18.8-56.7], p<.01), leg pain on the NRS (34.9% [13.9-52.7], p<.01), and number of daily steps (25.6% [4.9-43.9], p=.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Supervised PT for patients with LSS resulted in significant short-term improvements in symptom severity, physical function, walking distance, pain, and physical activity compared with unsupervised exercise.

KEYWORDS:

Home exercise; Individually tailored exercise; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Pedometer; Physical activity; Physical therapy; Randomized controlled trial; Supervised exercise; Walking distance; Zurich claudication questionnaire

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center