Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007120. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007120.

Simultaneous Comparison of Electrocardiographic Imaging and Epicardial Contact Mapping in Structural Heart Disease.

Author information

1
Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.J.G., M.O., G.D., H.D., N.T.S., J.D.L., A. Cambridge, J.G., N.J.O., S.W.-A., M.L., M.F., M.J.E., A. Chow, S.S., M.D., R.J.S., R.J.H., P.D.L.).
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering (M.O.), University College London, United Kingdom.
3
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (E.Z.).
4
Institute of Cardiovascular Science (P.T., P.D.L.), University College London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The accuracy of ECG imaging (ECGI) in structural heart disease remains uncertain. This study aimed to provide a detailed comparison of ECGI and contact-mapping system (CARTO) electrograms.

METHODS:

Simultaneous epicardial mapping using CARTO (Biosense-Webster, CA) and ECGI (CardioInsight) in 8 patients was performed to compare electrogram morphology, activation time (AT), and repolarization time (RT). Agreement between AT and RT from CARTO and ECGI was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient, ρ AT and ρ RT, root mean square error, E AT and E RT, and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS:

After geometric coregistration, 711 (439-905; median, first-third quartiles) ECGI and CARTO points were paired per patient. AT maps showed ρ AT=0.66 (0.53-0.73) and E AT=24 (21-32) ms, RT maps showed ρ RT=0.55 (0.41-0.71) and E RT=51 (38-70) ms. The median correlation coefficient measuring the morphological similarity between the unipolar electrograms was equal to 0.71 (0.65-0.74) for the entire signal, 0.67 (0.59-0.76) for QRS complexes, and 0.57 (0.35-0.76) for T waves. Local activation map correlation, ρ AT, was lower when default filters were used (0.60 (0.30-0.71), P=0.053). Small misalignment of the ECGI and CARTO geometries (below ±4 mm and ±4°) could introduce variations in the median ρ AT up to ±25%. Minimum distance between epicardial pacing sites and the region of earliest activation in ECGI was 13.2 (0.0-28.3) mm from 25 pacing sites with stimulation to QRS interval <40 ms.

CONCLUSIONS:

This simultaneous assessment demonstrates that ECGI maps activation and repolarization parameters with moderate accuracy. ECGI and contact electrogram correlation is sensitive to electrode apposition and geometric alignment. Further technological developments may improve spatial resolution.

KEYWORDS:

ECG imaging; activation and repolarization maps; contact mapping; unipolar electrograms; ventricular tachycardia

PMID:
30947511
DOI:
10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007120

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center