Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214206. eCollection 2019.

Gains in health insurance coverage explain variation in Democratic vote share in the 2008-2016 presidential elections.

Author information

1
O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
2
Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
3
School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
4
Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
5
Department of Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
6
National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.

Abstract

In the last decade, health care reform has dominated U.S. public policy and political discourse. Double-digit rate increases in premiums in the Health Insurance Marketplaces established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2018 make this an ongoing issue that could affect future elections. A seminal event that changed the course of policy and politics around health care reform is the 2016 presidential election. The results of the 2016 presidential election departed considerably from polling forecasts. Given the prominence of the Affordable Care Act in the election, we test whether changes in health insurance coverage at the county-level correlate with changes in party vote share in the presidential elections from 2008 through 2016. We find that a one-percentage-point increase in county health insurance coverage was associated with a 0.25-percentage-point increase in the vote share for the Democratic presidential candidate. We further find that these gains on the part of the Democratic candidate came almost fully at the expense of the Republican (as opposed to third-party) presidential candidates. We also estimate models separately for states that did and did not expand Medicaid and find no differential effect of insurance gains on Democratic vote share for states that expanded Medicaid compared to those that did not. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that outcomes in health insurance markets played a role in the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. The decisions made by the current administration, and how those decisions affect health insurance coverage and costs, may be important factors in future elections as well.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center