Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 26;21(3):e13249. doi: 10.2196/13249.

Genomic Common Data Model for Seamless Interoperation of Biomedical Data in Clinical Practice: Retrospective Study.

Author information

1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
2
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
3
Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
4
Department of Pathology, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
5
Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
6
IQVIA, Durham, NC, United States.
7
Department of Epidemiology, Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, United States.
8
Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
9
Department of Pharmacy, Kangwon University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
#
Contributed equally

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Clinical sequencing data should be shared in order to achieve the sufficient scale and diversity required to provide strong evidence for improving patient care. A distributed research network allows researchers to share this evidence rather than the patient-level data across centers, thereby avoiding privacy issues. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model (CDM) used in distributed research networks has low coverage of sequencing data and does not reflect the latest trends of precision medicine.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the feasibility of a genomic CDM (G-CDM), as an extension of the OMOP-CDM, for application of genomic data in clinical practice.

METHODS:

Existing genomic data models and sequencing reports were reviewed to extend the OMOP-CDM to cover genomic data. The Human Genome Organisation Gene Nomenclature Committee and Human Genome Variation Society nomenclature were adopted to standardize the terminology in the model. Sequencing data of 114 and 1060 patients with lung cancer were obtained from the Ajou University School of Medicine database of Ajou University Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas, respectively, which were transformed to a format appropriate for the G-CDM. The data were compared with respect to gene name, variant type, and actionable mutations.

RESULTS:

The G-CDM was extended into four tables linked to tables of the OMOP-CDM. Upon comparison with The Cancer Genome Atlas data, a clinically actionable mutation, p.Leu858Arg, in the EGFR gene was 6.64 times more frequent in the Ajou University School of Medicine database, while the p.Gly12Xaa mutation in the KRAS gene was 2.02 times more frequent in The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. The data-exploring tool GeneProfiler was further developed to conduct descriptive analyses automatically using the G-CDM, which provides the proportions of genes, variant types, and actionable mutations. GeneProfiler also allows for querying the specific gene name and Human Genome Variation Society nomenclature to calculate the proportion of patients with a given mutation.

CONCLUSIONS:

We developed the G-CDM for effective integration of genomic data with standardized clinical data, allowing for data sharing across institutes. The feasibility of the G-CDM was validated by assessing the differences in data characteristics between two different genomic databases through the proposed data-exploring tool GeneProfiler. The G-CDM may facilitate analyses of interoperating clinical and genomic datasets across multiple institutions, minimizing privacy issues and enabling researchers to better understand the characteristics of patients and promote personalized medicine in clinical practice.

KEYWORDS:

data visualization; databases, genetic; high-throughput nucleotide sequencing; multicenter study; patient privacy

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for JMIR Publications Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center