Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cancer Med. 2019 Mar 26. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2096. [Epub ahead of print]

The effect of adopting pediatric protocols in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in pediatric vs adult centers: An IMPACT Cohort study.

Gupta S1,2,3,4, Pole JD3,4,5,6, Baxter NN3,4,6,7, Sutradhar R3,4,6, Lau C3, Nagamuthu C3, Nathan PC1,2,3,4.

Author information

1
Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
3
Cancer Research Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
4
Institute for Health Policy, Evaluation and Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
5
Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, 480 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
6
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
7
Department of General Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Retrospective studies have shown adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have superior survival when treated in pediatric versus adult centers (locus of care; LOC). Several adult centers recently adopted pediatric protocols. Whether this has narrowed LOC disparities in real-world settings is unknown.

METHODS:

The IMPACT Cohort is an Ontario population-based cohort that captured demographic, disease and treatment (treatment protocol, chemotherapy doses) data for all 15-21 year olds diagnosed with ALL 1992-2011. Cancer outcomes were determined by chart abstraction and linkage to provincial healthcare databases. Treatment protocols were classified as pediatric- or adult-based. We examined predictors of outcome, including LOC, protocol, disease biology, and time period.

RESULTS:

Of 271 patients, 152 (56%) received therapy at adult centers. 5-year event-free survival (EFS ± SE) among AYA at pediatric vs adult centers was 72% ± 4% vs 56% ± 4% (P = 0.03); 5-year overall survival (OS) was 82% ± 4% vs 64% ± 4% (P < 0.001). After adjustment, OS remained inferior at adult centers (hazard ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval 1.1-6.1; P = 0.04). In the most recent period (2006-2011), 39/59 (66%) AYA treated at adult centers received pediatric protocols. These AYA had outcomes superior to the 20 AYA treated on adult protocols, but inferior to the 44 AYA treated at pediatric centers (EFS 72% ± 5% vs 60% ± 9% vs 81% ± 6%; P = 0.02; OS 77% ± 7% vs 65% ± 11% vs 91% ± 4%; P = 0.004). Induction deaths and treatment-related mortality did not vary by LOC.

CONCLUSIONS:

Survival disparities between AYA with ALL treated in pediatric vs adult centers have persisted over time, partially attributable to incomplete adoption of pediatric protocols by adult centers. Although pediatric protocol use has improved survival, residual disparities remain, perhaps due to other differences in care between adult and pediatric centers.

KEYWORDS:

acute lymphobastic leukemia; adolescents and young adults; locus of care; population-based; survival

PMID:
30912628
DOI:
10.1002/cam4.2096
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center