Electrical, mechanical, acoustical, and biocompatibility characterizations of the conformal ultrasonic device. a, Impedance and phase angle spectra of the 1–3 composite, showing the excellent piezoelectricity. The resonant and anti-resonant frequency ranges are labeled in shaded circles. The left inset is the equivalent RLC circuit diagram of the piezoelectric transducer. At the resonant frequency, the impedance of the equivalent circuit is at the minimum, which will be the most power efficient. At the anti-resonant frequency, the impedance of the equivalent circuit is at the maximum, and the transducer will have the largest damping. b, Ultrasonic receiving signals on the ulnar artery, with two clear echo peaks from the anterior (ant) and posterior (post) vessel walls. Inset is a schematic diagram representing the transducer and the ulnar artery to show echo peaks aligned with the ant and post vessel walls. Tx represents the transducer. c, Time and frequency domain characterization of the signal in b (post-wall peak), showing excellent signal quality and bandwidth (dashed line), indicating the high sensitivity of the transducer. d, Simulated acoustic emission profile of a piezoelectric material size of 0.9 × 0.9 mm2 (inset) with excellent beam directivity and penetration depth (>4 cm). e, Bi-axial tensile test of the device with stretchability up to 60% in the x-direction and 50% in y-direction without fracture. The zoomed-in image of the dashed box shows the slight plastic deformation when biaxial strain is larger than 30% in the x-direction. f, Fluorescent images of the fibroblast cells before (left panel) and after 16 hours (right panel) continuous exposure to the ultrasound generated by the conformal ultrasonic device. The 100% survival rate of the cells prove the excellent bio-compatibility of the conformal ultrasonic device.