Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan;147:e145. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819000360.

Seroprevalence of HCV, HBV and HIV in two inner-city London emergency departments.

Author information

1
Immunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department,Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance & Control (CIDSC), National Infection Service, Public Health England,London,UK.
2
The National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London,London,UK.
3
The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, The Royal Free Hospital,London,UK.
4
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University College London Hospital,London,UK.
5
Antiviral Unit, Virus Reference Department,National Infection Service, Public Health England,London,UK.
6
Blood Borne Virus Unit, Virus Reference Department,National Infection Service, Public Health England,London,UK.
7
Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,London,UK.

Abstract

In this paper we build on work investigating the feasibility of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in emergency departments (EDs), estimating the prevalence of hepatitis B, C and HIV infections among persons attending two inner-London EDs, identifying factors associated with testing positive in an ED. We also undertook molecular characterisation to look at the diversity of the viruses circulating in these individuals, and the presence of clinically significant mutations which impact on treatment and control.Blood-borne virus (BBV) testing in non-traditional settings is feasible, with emergency departments (ED) potentially effective at reaching vulnerable and underserved populations. We investigated the feasibility of BBV testing within two inner-London EDs. Residual samples from biochemistry for adults (⩾18 years) attending The Royal Free London Hospital (RFLH) or the University College London Hospital (UCLH) ED between January and June 2015 were tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Ag/Ab, anti-hepatitis C (HCV) and HBsAg. PCR and sequence analysis were conducted on reactive samples. Sero-prevalence among persons attending RFH and UCLH with residual samples (1287 and 1546), respectively, were 1.1% and 1.0% for HBsAg, 1.6% and 2.3% for anti-HCV, 0.9% and 1.6% for HCV RNA, and 1.3% and 2.2% for HIV. For RFH, HBsAg positivity was more likely among persons of black vs. white ethnicity (odds ratio 9.08; 95% confidence interval 2.72-30), with anti-HCV positivity less likely among females (0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.50). For UCLH, HBsAg positivity was more likely among non-white ethnicity (13.34, 95% CI 2.20-80.86 (Asian); 8.03, 95% CI 1.12-57.61 (black); and 8.11, 95% CI 1.13-58.18 (other/mixed)). Anti-HCV positivity was more likely among 36-55 year olds vs. ⩾56 years (7.69, 95% CI 2.24-26.41), and less likely among females (0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.65). Persons positive for HIV-markers were more likely to be of black vs. white ethnicity (4.51, 95% CI 1.63-12.45), and less likely to have one ED attendance (0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.88), or female (0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.42). These results indicate that BBV-testing in EDs is feasible, providing a basis for further studies to explore provider and patient acceptability, referral into care and cost-effectiveness.

KEYWORDS:

Anonymous testing; HIV; emergency department; hepatitis B; hepatitis C

PMID:
30869036
DOI:
10.1017/S0950268819000360

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Cambridge University Press
Loading ...
Support Center