Format

Send to

Choose Destination
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e937-e943. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 9.

Comparison of WEB Embolization and Coiling in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Safety and Efficacy Based on a Propensity Score Analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
2
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: lukas.goertz@uk-koeln.de.
3
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Berlin (Charité), Berlin, Germany.
4
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
5
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the safety and efficacy between Woven EndoBridge (WEB) embolization and conventional coiling for treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms using a propensity score-matched analysis.

METHODS:

Consecutive patients treated with the WEB at 3 German neurovascular centers and with coiling at a single center during 2011 and 2018 were analyzed. Procedure-related complications, clinical outcome, and angiographic results were retrospectively evaluated and compared.

RESULTS:

Sixty-seven patients treated by coiling and 56 patients treated with the WEB were identified. Significant differences between the 2 groups were observed in patient age (P = 0.048), aneurysm location (P < 0.01), aneurysm size (P = 0.02), and neck width (P < 0.01). The overall complication rate was comparable between the coil group (9.0%) and the WEB group (8.9%, P = 1.0). Favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) was obtained in 98.5% after coiling and 98.2% after WEB treatment. At last available angiographic follow-up, WEB yielded a higher complete aneurysm occlusion rate (87.2%) than coiling (60.8%, P < 0.01). Nine patients in the coil cohort (17.6%) and 2 patients in the WEB cohort (4.3%) underwent retreatment (P = 0.05). After 1:1 propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in complication (P = 1.0) and morbidity rates (P = 1.0), whereas there was a trend toward a higher complete aneurysm occlusion rate after WEB treatment (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS:

Treatment of unruptured aneurysms with the WEB provides potentially higher aneurysm occlusion rates than conventional coiling while having similar complication rates and no additional morbidity.

KEYWORDS:

Coiling; Propensity score; Unruptured intracranial aneurysm; WEB; Woven EndoBridge

PMID:
30862582
DOI:
10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.016

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center